I read a thread somewhere, it might have been on here, about someone saying they'd never carry JHP again in their CCW. Something about tearing up to much flesh, or damaging to much? They said the FMJ would just drill a clean hole.... I'm just curious how one comes this train of thought? Isn't the point to stop the threat immediately? How is a FMJ a better tool for this than a JHP? Someone help me out on this one, I'm failing to understand the logic behind this.