Glock Forum banner

Should Body Armor Be Strictly Reculated?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 7.0%
  • No

    Votes: 40 93.0%
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
4,925 Posts
No, because only law abiding citizens follow rules/regulations .
Criminals will still get body armor, guns (illegally) and everything else.
What we need is stronger penalties for criminals. And like you say, arm school personnel and add more officers to schools and our streets and train them both well.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,925 Posts
Many of the anti-gunners have also called for “psychological screening” before being allowed to purchase a firearm. The problem I see with that is it’s far too subjective. I can see some liberally educated anti-firearm doctors just using their position to impose their views on society by not allowing people they don’t agree with to purchase a firearm. Besides, many sociopaths are also clever enough to beat a system like that. What do the rest of you think about this?
Yes, a psychological screening could be used in an unfair and illegal manner, and it is unconstitutional.
 
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top