Joined
·
18 Posts
Sorry, I meant the 29 is closer in size to the 23...not the full size 20.buzznrose said:I just bought the G21 gen 4 and really like it. Would have bought a 20 if they had the gen 4 out.
The 20 is larger than your 27, it closer in size to the 23.
You can't go wrong either way you go.
Gotta say, I loved my 29sf. If you're hiking and you have to use it, I doubt it will ever be further than a ten yard difference. Go with the 29 and get some heavy 200 grain Buffalo Bore ammo. This way, you can still conceal on your person without freaking the other hikers out, and still be protected.
Haha I'm sure that's it.SeventiesWreckers said:For me, the hikers are always freaked out, of course I'm usually on horseback, with a carbine in a scabbard. Probably the horse I'm thinking.
You are correct, the .40 is a cut down 10mm. But when you move from 180gr down to 165gr bullets in a .40, the bullets perform the same or slightly better then a full power 10mm in recent tests I have seen.Also, when you have a 20 or 29, the 27 for HD becomes obsolete and remains a safe-queen only to be used for the range.
I'd rather have the full powered 10mm over the .40 for HD anyday, but would probably choose the easier handling .40 for conceal carry in public.
Besides, the .40 is just a cut down 10mm from what I understand.
Yep! Gotta be the horse!For me, the hikers are always freaked out, of course I'm usually on horseback, with a carbine in a scabbard. Probably the horse I'm thinking.
All good points. Thanks. I think it will be the G20. I had one before but I was thinking about the G29. Maybe when I get the chance I will tell my G20 versus the black bear in my garage story.