Glock Firearms banner
1 - 16 of 16 Posts

·
GrassHopper
Joined
·
8,204 Posts
I have yet to come across the term in any form of law...

As far as I know it has yet to be mentioned.

I know for a fact that AZ makes no mention of it.

I'll check it out though, gimme a sec...
 

·
GrassHopper
Joined
·
8,204 Posts
Just finished a search of the Westlaw database...

"hair trigger" has no legal definition, however, the term has been used in cases, federal and state, in reference to firearms with less than a 2.5lbs trigger weight.

Some states may have laws governing a minimum trigger weight...

(please see disclaimer in signature)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,348 Posts
Considering that gun people can't agree on a definition, a consisten legal definition would be nearly impossible.
 

·
GrassHopper
Joined
·
8,204 Posts
Last time I went to Florida, my great uncle took us to the range. He let us shoot his kimber custom 1911. He didn't tell us it had a "hair trigger", scared the living crap out of me!!!! Jesus!!! Ever wonder why some ranges gave holes in strange places... Thats why... After the first shot though, it was fun shooting. I might lower the trigger weight on my glock at some point. (and no, none of those holes are mine, my finger stays off the trigger till I'm on target).
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,947 Posts
I'm pretty happy with the ghost 3.5 and the wolf 6# spring, but I may still tinker with it to drop some of the "snap"
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
217 Posts
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
@ rivalarrival....nothing specific, I intend on replacing the trigger and bar on my ccw (lc9) to shorten the travel. But that makes it an altered weapon which could be a problem if the weapon is ever used to stop Joe schmuckatelli from doing things he shouldn't be doing.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,834 Posts
@ rivalarrival....nothing specific, I intend on replacing the trigger and bar on my ccw (lc9) to shorten the travel. But that makes it an altered weapon which could be a problem if the weapon is ever used to stop Joe schmuckatelli from doing things he shouldn't be doing.
I removed the mag safety on mine(LC9) and it helped moderatly.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
385 Posts
@ rivalarrival....nothing specific, I intend on replacing the trigger and bar on my ccw (lc9) to shorten the travel. But that makes it an altered weapon which could be a problem if the weapon is ever used to stop Joe schmuckatelli from doing things he shouldn't be doing.
How could that "be a problem"?
To me, altering a trigger to make it lighter is making that weapon more accurate. Therefore it could save your life due to better placement.

I've never found any case law that addresses this issue.
 

·
GrassHopper
Joined
·
8,204 Posts
Just for you guys, I have legal writing this term. So for my class paper I'll do one about altered firearms and court cases. Settle this question once and for all.
 

·
Are we there yet?
Joined
·
784 Posts
@ rivalarrival....nothing specific, I intend on replacing the trigger and bar on my ccw (lc9) to shorten the travel. But that makes it an altered weapon which could be a problem if the weapon is ever used to stop Joe schmuckatelli from doing things he shouldn't be doing.
I don't buy into this "altered weapon" crap. The only time an altered weapon will matter is if the shooting wasn't justified.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,214 Posts
The trigger jobs I do for most are 3.5# jobs and that's far from what I would consider a "hair trigger". I haven't seen anything anywhere about laws governing trigger pull weight.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
285 Posts
No legal definition I know of. Biggest issue with any shooting that the lawyers look at is any altering done to the stock weapon. If there was anything done (ie: light trigger, removal of safeties or safety equipment) it opens up a negligence/liability case which is civil and can lead to monetary damages being awarded.

Z-
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Top