Maybe Glock thought he was just being goofy (but after reading that Glock - Rise of America's Gun book, it's not clear that Glock has a sense of humor). Sad, how the writer of the story takes one person's (misguided) actions, and makes all gun owners out to be as irresponsible with their real weapons as Glock was with a squirt gun.
I'd have to see the water gun in question. If it looks real, and he was acting and speaking in a threatening manner, he'd end up in jail if this had happened in the US. He'd be charged with somewhere between aggravated assault and making terroristic threats.
BE IT KNOWN TO ALL POSTERS AND READERS OF THIS THREAD
That GlockForum, its owners, partners, affiliates and staff, do not condone nor encourage or support any action or activity that by consequence of action or implication would in fact or spirit constitute Identity Theft, Deceptive Misrepresentation, or Fraudulent Misrepresentation (including Misrepresentation Without Monetary Gain) as defined by both Federal Law as well as local laws in effect in the State of Texas as well as International Laws subscribed to by International Treaty between the United States and Austria, as well as the laws of Austria, as regards to Members claiming to be real and living persons who they are not. Misrepresentation takes place when one issues or makes statements that are deceptive in content in or out of context, or when the statement or declaration is made with deceptive intent as in claiming to have been made by someone else other than the real author thru the use of an alias that mimics a real and living person.
Readers are encouraged to bear in mind that such person or persons espousing direct or implied claims to this effect, are in fact doing so of their own free will, beyond the control of GlockForum. As such, GlockForum cannot be made liable for Member claims to the contrary in this case, and shall be kept free and clear of any consequence, direct or indirect, from same action or actions.
Furthermore, GlockForum encourages readers to also bear in mind that the offenses mentioned above are not protected by the First Amendment, and that violators cannot seek protection under the laws of Freedom of Speech and Expression.
Furthermore, GlockForum reminds all its readers and subscribers that it is in fact legally an online publication, and messages posted to any thread therein have the equivalent weight of printed publications, and are subject to the same rules and protections as may exist from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, such as defamation or libel.
Furthermore, GlockForum encourages all posters to bear in mind that under the CyberSecurity Data Sharing Act of 2012, all online records, including a history of messages and edits, must be shared with law enforcement should same be required, without the need for a court order compelling same.
Furthermore, GlockForum reminds all posters that Glock Incorporated, whether thru its appointed representatives in the United States (on behalf of Glock USA) or in other countries (on behalf of Glock, Inc), does on occasion visit this site, and that this must be kept in mind when posting to Forum. Additionally, should Glock, Inc or any of its duly appointed representatives so request it, all records of posts and replies shall be made available to them.
While GlockForum invites and encourages all intelligent and polite discussion, it has no control over the content or context of Member postings. The consequences of Misrepresentation (in any variation thereof) extend beyond merely being banned from GlockForum, but into the realm of real legal action. GlockForum will be unable to assist any Member in the event of legal action.
That legalese reply should answers your last question. This is an open members forum. You are using a real persons name as your ID in the forum. As stated above, this online forum is subject to federal laws and guidelines. Is that a knock at your door?