Glock Firearms banner
41 - 60 of 88 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,968 Posts
My son-in-law bought a Glock 44 yesterday, and also bought the threaded barrel so he could use his suppressor on it.

So, naturally we had to go to the range with it today. That, plus the fact that I had not gone to the range since April and I was ready to go shoot something.

We took the best combined assortment of ammunition that we had between us to try to give it a good test. We had Remington Golden Bullet, Winchester, Aguila, Federal Bulk Pak, Blazer, and even tried some CCI Quiet 22.

Put about 400 rounds through the G44 without a single hiccup with any of the brands except the CCI Quiet ammo (which did not surprise us).

About 200 rounds were without the suppressor and about 200 with the suppressor and it all worked flawlessly except the CCI which fired no problem but would not cycle the slide.

We both own other Glocks and really liked the feel of the G44. Accuracy seemed to be great and loved shooting it. Very happy with the quality and reliability of the gun so far. Hope it continues for years and years.

So I give the G44 high marks for this first outing. My son-in-law really liked it as well.
Congrats,glad all went well on it's first outing and it sounds as if fun was had by one and all.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
40 Posts
At my local range I have had experience with three different Glock 44s. None of them work reliably with standard velocity ammunition. They all work fine with high velocity ammunition such as CCI Mini Mags and Aguila Super Extra. Buy a Taurus TX22.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,677 Posts
At my local range I have had experience with three different Glock 44s. None of them work reliably with standard velocity ammunition. They all work fine with high velocity ammunition such as CCI Mini Mags and Aguila Super Extra. Buy a Taurus TX22.
Send them to me... I'll make sure they function just fine. :)

Best regards,

Bob
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
867 Posts
At my local range I have had experience with three different Glock 44s. None of them work reliably with standard velocity ammunition. They all work fine with high velocity ammunition such as CCI Mini Mags and Aguila Super Extra. Buy a Taurus TX22.
We had some CCI mini-mags but intentionally did not shoot any of that. We were pretty sure there would be no problem with mini-mags so we just shot cheap ammo that we thought might be a problem, or that we had heard that people had problems with.

The gun felt really great to shoot. Felt and shot just like a Glock 19 without the kick. The trigger felt exactly the same as my Glock19 and the grip feel was identical to my Glock19.

My son-in-law has never been a huge fan of shooting a 22, but he said that he really liked shooting it and will probably spend more time with it than he had with his Sig Mosquito that he has. He shot some with it as well and had multiple, fail-to-fire, and fail-to-eject problems with it using the same ammo brands.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,861 Posts
My son-in-law has never been a huge fan of shooting a 22, but he said that he really like shooting it and will probably spend more time with it that he had with his Sig Mosquito that he has. He shot some with it as well and had multiple, fail-to-fire, and fail-to-eject problems with it using the same ammo brands.
I had a Sig Mosquito and as much as I liked the feel and Action of the gun, it choked on most ammo I fed it. Traded it on a Ruger Mk3. It shoots very well (accurate) but is heavy. And it sucks for drills based on my needs.

The G44 is pretty much everything I want in a .22. Reliable, decent accuracy, and works great for a training pistol. If I went out hunting, I’d take my Ruger, as it is very accurate...but my G44 is plenty accurate for pistol drills.
 

·
Glockin’ since 1993
Joined
·
41,430 Posts
The Sig Mosquito was one of the few guns I refused to stock, when I worked at the gun shop. Never heard of one ever running right.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
276 Posts
At my local range I have had experience with three different Glock 44s. None of them work reliably with standard velocity ammunition. They all work fine with high velocity ammunition such as CCI Mini Mags and Aguila Super Extra. Buy a Taurus TX22.
he had with his Sig Mosquito that he has. He shot some with it as well and had multiple, fail-to-fire, and fail-to-eject problems with it using the same ammo brands.
The new Taurus TX22 I bought was giving me malfunctions from day one. I have cleaned it twice, tried four different brands and types of ammunition and still rarely got through a magazine without a failure to feed usually after the third or fourth shot. I disassembled and cleaned the magazines, still having problems. I contacted Taurus Customer Service and after a lengthy discussion they want the gun back. I went through my thinking that it was the magazines but they want the gun and magazines back, They sent me a return label but advised me that the turn around was 12 weeks. I'm very unhappy, but I will get over it. Buy a Glock.
;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
114 Posts
My 44 seems to work with most everything I have tried IF I make sure the first rd. to feed from the mag is pointing upward . I have no problem working with this as I have had for several yrs. a GSG 1911-22 that I have to do the same .
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
469 Posts
My 44 seems to work with most everything I have tried IF I make sure the first rd. to feed from the mag is pointing upward . I have no problem working with this as I have had for several yrs. a GSG 1911-22 that I have to do the same .
That definitely seems to be the case with the vast majority of Glock 44’s. I was able to get near perfect reliability out of mine with 16 out of 17 flavors of .22 even without loading it as the instructions insist. However, our resident brilliant gun engineer/fiddler rbbeers has proven that just the simple addition of slots on the magazine completely eliminates the need to care about what that top round is doing because it would always be in the right place. Unfortunately Glock hasn’t seen fit to incorporate this simple and cheap modification even though they have been made aware of it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
114 Posts
" However, our resident brilliant gun engineer/fiddler rbbeers has proven that just the simple addition of slots on the magazine completely eliminates the need to care about what that top round is doing because it would always be in the right place. Unfortunately Glock hasn’t seen fit to incorporate this simple and cheap modification even though they have been made aware of it."
Would like to know more about the slots that cure first rd. feeding problems . I have not seen that idea .
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,677 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
867 Posts
My 44 seems to work with most everything I have tried IF I make sure the first rd. to feed from the mag is pointing upward . I have no problem working with this as I have had for several yrs. a GSG 1911-22 that I have to do the same .
My son-in-law and I both bought G-44's in the last month and have shot them with all kinds of ammo.

The only problem he had was CCI Quiet would fire but not cycle the slide and rechamber the next round. Not a surprise since the ammo pretty much states it is not for automatics.

We shot pretty much every other ammo you can find normally including a good bit of 36 grain bulk .22 lr. He payed no attention to how his mags were loaded and in probably 500 rounds not a single failure to feed, eject, or anything else with his.

I started out being really careful with the first round pointing up, then saw a video that it did not have to point up so I shot about 20 mags worth making sure that the ammo WAS NOT pointing up and had no failures to feed of any kind and out of the 200 rounds had one stovepipe with Blazer 40 grain.

So, I have decided the two guns that I have personal experience with will shoot pretty much any ammo including 36 grain and bulk ammo, it it takes no special precautions with magazine loading. Totally happy with them both.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,677 Posts
I started out being really careful with the first round pointing up, then saw a video that it did not have to point up so I shot about 20 mags worth making sure that the ammo WAS NOT pointing up and had no failures to feed of any kind and out of the 200 rounds had one stovepipe with Blazer 40 grain.
The purpose of the tab on the top front of the magazine is to push the bullet of the top cartridge 'up' if it's pointing 'low'... the tab 'does its job' most of the time.

However, IF the top cartridge is pointing 'too low', the cartridge will indeed jam against the tab and fail to feed.

With the slots cut into the magazine, the top cartridge simply cannot point 'too low'.

Best regards,

Bob
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
867 Posts
The purpose of the tab on the top front of the magazine is to push the bullet of the top cartridge 'up' if it's pointing 'low'... the tab 'does its job' most of the time.

However, IF the top cartridge is pointing 'too low', the cartridge will indeed jam against the tab and fail to feed.

Best regards,

Bob
I understand and if I was having a problem with feeds then I would worry more about it. But I was not able to make it fail by having the rounds point pretty much directly at the tab so I just started loading without really paying any attention to it.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,677 Posts
I understand and if I was having a problem with feeds then I would worry more about it. But I was not able to make it fail by having the rounds point pretty much directly at the tab so I just started loading without really paying any attention to it.
I'm glad your experience with your pistol is good... but that doesn't negate the issue or the value of the 'fix' for those pistols and magazines that aren't quite so cooperative. ;) :D

Best regards,

Bob
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
867 Posts
I'm glad your experience with your pistol is good... but that doesn't negate the issue or the value of the 'fix' for those pistols and magazines that aren't quite so cooperative. ;) :D

Best regards,

Bob
Oh no, I agree with that. Even when I first started with it I was very careful about position of the top round and it really was not that big a deal to give it a shake and it fell right into position.

I did see where someone had brought out a 16 or 18 round mag for it and I wonder if those are reliable ?
I'll be looking for reviews and comments on those and other larger capacity magazines.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,677 Posts
I did see where someone had brought out a 16 or 18 round mag for it and I wonder if those are reliable ?
I'm not aware of one, but I wasn't looking for one either.

I'll scout around and see what I can find... maybe we can get some help from some other members as well.

'Til later... :)

Best regards,

Bob
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,677 Posts
41 - 60 of 88 Posts
Top