Glock Forum banner

Glock 26 vs. Sig P365 & 43X – Concealed Carry Comparison (my thoughts)

8 reading
502 views 16 replies 5 participants last post by  Brandon Breeze  
#1 · (Edited)
As a still somewhat recent owner of the P365 and having spent decades owning, shooting, carrying Glocks I wanted to share some thoughts on comparing the P365 (micro) to the Glock 26 one of the OG's in the sub-compact realm.

This comparison doesn't consider that you can swap the grip frame of the P365 around, it's a comparison of it as is to the G26.

For those like myself who may have thought "why would I need/want a P365" when you already have every Glock known to man? 🤔


TLDR, for those that would rather read about it than watch the video: 👀

Size & Concealment
  • P365 is noticeably thinner and lighter, making it easier to conceal for many folks.
  • Glock 26 has a thicker grip, which may be better for shooters with larger hands, or men 😅 (I kid, I kid) :cool:
Capacity
  • Both offer similar standard capacity (10+1), with the ability to use OEM extended magazines. Sig does a better job with OEM mag bases that fill the gap for longer clips.
  • Both platforms support a wide range of aftermarket mags and baseplates. (just seeing if you're actually reading by using the word clips above 😁)
Shooting Performance
  • The Glock 26 feels softer shooting and quicker back on target, thanks to its heavier slide soaking up more recoil/muzzle flip.💪
  • The P365 is still very controllable, but has a snappier feel due to its smaller & thinner frame.
Ergonomics
  • P365 grip is compact, ideal for concealment but can feel small in the hand. I wear a size L glove for reference.
  • Glock 26 offers a different grip profile that may feel more natural for medium/large+ hands.
Customization & Features
  • P365 comes with a rail for lights/lasers, giving it the edge in stock features.
  • Glock 26 benefits from the massive aftermarket and consistency with the rest of the Glock lineup.
Not Mentioned in the Video
  • The G26 & all Glocks are much easier and more straightforward to work on.
Final Thoughts
  • P365 → Best for maximum concealability with modern features right out of the box.
  • Glock 26 → Best for Glock fans who value consistency, softer recoil, and deep aftermarket support.
At the end of the day, you can’t go wrong with either pistol, both are proven, reliable carry guns. Share your thoughts below!
 
#2 ·
I own the p365 for its size to capacity & accuracy. It’s nowhere as well built as a Glock 26. All the p365 springs are recommended to be changed at a lower round count then the Glock 26. The P365 to me is a gun that fits a specific role. I trust the G26 more than I do the p365’s. The G26 has a much longer proven track record. All that being said I’m embarrassed to admit I put shots on target more accurately & faster with the p365. 😂

Great side by side review. I enjoyed it!
 
#3 ·
Yeah, if you watched the shooting portion of the video, you see even without an optic I shoot the 26 faster. Mostly because I have far more trigger time on it, so its much easier. I've seen the spring replacement recommendations for the Sig, which is odd to me because I don't think I've ever had to replace ANY Glock springs. I did have a trigger return spring break on my first Glock 19, fortunately this happened during dry fire, but that's it after decades of shooting of shooting Glocks.
 
#4 ·
I’ve got both. The -365 is the SAS version which had rounded corners and was great for pocket carry until the meprolight light broke (twice). To Sigs credit they replaced it after the first time but after the second I had concerns of reliability and replaced it with a holosun green mini dot solving the issue. But it made it too big for easy pocket carry so the G43 does that role now.

The -365 is a good gun. The basic model can be pocket carried

I’ve got a -33 which also becomes a -26 with conversion barrel and mags. It could also be a -27 with .40 barrel. I carry it OWB with the .357 Sig cartridge and use the 9s for training. The -33/26 for me is way too big for pocket carry and it’s either iwb or owb ( I prefer to carry it owb).

So to me they’re kinda different missions.

The 33/26 is shorter which makes it conceal better than a -19 when carried OWB.
 
#5 ·
I just saw a P365 SAS today at one of the LGS. It had one of the old Sig Romeo red dots on it IIRC. I was kinda baffled as to why someone would do that to a pew that's specifically tailored to pocket carry, now that makes sense! Also saw a 33 at the same LGS, it was tempting for sure, but they also had a Saiga in .308. Would have been easy to spend a ton there today, lol.
 
#13 ·
#16 ·
i pocket carry my p365 which i have since moved to a wilson combat 12rd grip module. still pocket carry.
sold my glock 33 a long time ago, coworker won't sell it back to me. but i got a free gen5 26 collecting dust so i bought a glockstore 26x frame (makes it a 19 sized grip with 26 length slide) and hopefully it ship soons. it should be fine as my iwb gun which is currently a p365xlm (xl slide with tyrantcnc macro sized grip for the 17rd mag) w/scs carry optic and tlr7sub light. i hate this thing. lol. i'm done with optics on my carry guns. duty gun fine, everything else, it's just weight. i'm getting too old.
 
#17 ·
Figured since I'm comparing the Sig to another Glock I'd keep it in the same thread!

P365 vs Glock 43X


TLDR for those that would rather read about it than watch the video:

Ran a direct comparison between Sig P365 and Glock 43X.

Concealability: Slight edge to the P365 (shorter OAL; similar width).

Capacity (OEM): P365 wins—multiple OEM mag sizes/capacities.

43X OEM is 10-rd. Recoil/Control: 43X feels a bit softer and quicker back on target.

Tested with/without an Omega comp; even without it, the Glock’s backstrap hump sits nicely in the palm.

Ergonomics: Hand-dependent. 43X backstrap shape works well for many; P365 is slimmer.

Customization: Both strong; P365 gets the nod for modular grip modules/frames.

Bottom line: Choose P365 for maximum concealability + OEM mag flexibility + modularity.

Choose 43X for slightly softer recoil + Glock ecosystem familiarity. Curious what others prefer for CCW between these two and why. (Video has shooting clips if you want to see the recoil difference.)