Glock Forum banner

American Tactical Apparel

1994 Views 11 Replies 10 Participants Last post by  series11
Saw this on my favorite tactical blog… figured its worth sharing… I kinda like it, if I had the money...





Houston Police Officer Brian Hoffner has created a new line of clothing called American Tactical Apparel. According to a report on Houston’s KSDK -

“Pants cost $150 a pair. They include 15 pockets, including one on the side that’s large enough to fit a handgun.

“I have a full-size GLOCK on. If I need it now, I simply pull down this tab and I draw my GLOCK and I’m ready to defend myself,” said Brian Hoffner, founder of American Tactical Apparel. “Nothing’s pulling anywhere. It’s totally comfortable. And a full-size gun concealed. It’s a necessity. Fifteen pockets for tactical use. For rifle mags, pistol mags, phones, cameras, ammunition, whatever you may need.”






www.americantacticalapparel.com
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
Thanks for sharing the link...
2
Here is a picture for those that don't like clicking links… and a video…





[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18qwORawkk4&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
See less See more
I actually like the look of the pants and shorts for the most part. I can't stand that little zipper in the front. I have a pair of regular shorts with that and hate them. And the denim color is too dark a blue. If they lightened the color, lost the zipper and brought the price down $100 I'd buy them. I can see $50 for a pair but not $150. Maybe I'm wanting them for too little but I'd buy 3-4 of each and that requires better pricing.

But the design seems really wel thought out. Wish I could find them at kohls. I'd love to see a department store carry weapon-friendly clothing. After all they carry Paris Hilton and the kardasian ding-a-links, why not something I could use...
Humm I wonder what my Tailor could do with some of the pants I already own to make something like these!

I actually like the look of the pants and shorts for the most part. I can't stand that little zipper in the front. I have a pair of regular shorts with that and hate them. And the denim color is too dark a blue. If they lightened the color, lost the zipper and brought the price down $100 I'd buy them. I can see $50 for a pair but not $150. Maybe I'm wanting them for too little but I'd buy 3-4 of each and that requires better pricing.

But the design seems really wel thought out. Wish I could find them at kohls. I'd love to see a department store carry weapon-friendly clothing. After all they carry Paris Hilton and the kardasian ding-a-links, why not something I could use...
I'd love to see a department store carry weapon-friendly clothing.
I would LOVE to see gun carry apparrel in my local Big Blue or Big Red box store! But I still wouldn't pay $150 for those pants.
They are UGLY!!! Like my grandpas pants ugly.

Save the $150 and get a nice holster instead.
voodoo said:
They are UGLY!!! Like my grandpas pants ugly.

Save the $150 and get a nice holster instead.
$150 is like four holsters lol

I actually like the look of the pants and shorts for the most part. I can't stand that little zipper in the front. I have a pair of regular shorts with that and hate them. And the denim color is too dark a blue. If they lightened the color, lost the zipper and brought the price down $100 I'd buy them. I can see $50 for a pair but not $150. Maybe I'm wanting them for too little but I'd buy 3-4 of each and that requires better pricing.

But the design seems really wel thought out. Wish I could find them at kohls. I'd love to see a department store carry weapon-friendly clothing. After all they carry Paris Hilton and the kardasian ding-a-links, why not something I could use...
LOL!I very much agree with your point of view
See less See more
The 15 pocket thing sounds good at first, but... If I have a space it's likely I'll stick something in it. Have to be careful or I'd end up walking like the tin man.
Interesting concept but like others I'll just watch it for now...
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top