hey jimmy, I was not directing my post to you, I was just making a statement, the problem is not the barrel it is the breech and the extractor to line up the primer, the breech on a .45 is to large to support a 10mm/40
I know that the 10mm and .40 are the same diameter, but that extra length means more powder so to get the same speed out of a .40 cartridge is pretty amazing.
Especially with that Buffalo Bore ammo haha.
double tap is a little hotter and some a little cooler, cheaper as well. DT is my edc ammo
Underwood's not only cheaper than that Cor-Bon and Hornady stuff he showed, but it's a lot more powerful as well. Full-power 10mm is 180gr @ 1300fps, or 135gr @ 1600fps, and those are just 2 of Underwood's 10mm loadings.
10mm Auto was developed first, and spawned the .40 S&W, (or 10mm Short
), the .357 Sig, and the 9x25 Dillon.
I wouldn't touch the 180s either haha, but the 155 gr. seems ok. I wouldn't go shooting it everyday in my Glock, but for self defense, that is some nasty ammunition.This guy is an idiot. The long "handle" on the G20 is nice though. I don't think that's why it "hangs in the belt, if you want to carry holsterless". Those 10mm rounds sure do have a lot of "fips".
That Buffalo Bore +P is insane. 180gr bullets in a .40 are, potentially, dangerous enough on their own. Putting more powder in them makes it crazy.
The 155gr might be ok, but I wouldn't touch the 180s.
Hornady 155 grain is what I use in my GLOCK 20 ......very nice round.post-apocalyptic said:Sorry, but he's wrong. That's some pretty hot, (and damn expensive), .40 S&W but nowhere near the power of full-power 10mm. He's just using the wrong ammo.
Of course, savvy 10mm owners buy Underwood Ammo.
Video Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deEmzTPVj-o
